Comments on: Apple Airport Extreme 802.11n Dissected, Benchmarked http://www.thinktechno.com/2007/02/07/apple-airport-extreme-80211n-dissected-benchmarked/ Daily Gadget News, Technology, Tips and Tutorials Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:02:17 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Long Distance Router http://www.thinktechno.com/2007/02/07/apple-airport-extreme-80211n-dissected-benchmarked/comment-page-1/#comment-47503 Long Distance Router Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:59:29 +0000 http://www.thinktechno.com/2007/02/07/apple-airport-extreme-80211n-dissected-benchmarked/#comment-47503 <strong>Long Distance Router...</strong> Dlink and Linksys are really facing off to see who can get the longest distance routers lately its funyn how far they will go... Long Distance Router…

Dlink and Linksys are really facing off to see who can get the longest distance routers lately its funyn how far they will go…

]]> By: phox http://www.thinktechno.com/2007/02/07/apple-airport-extreme-80211n-dissected-benchmarked/comment-page-1/#comment-42950 phox Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:18:38 +0000 http://www.thinktechno.com/2007/02/07/apple-airport-extreme-80211n-dissected-benchmarked/#comment-42950 I'm thinking the obvious reason for the performance discrepancy is that they didn't want to make the new Express 802.11n seem like a crap product by then having to claim lower numbers -- Apple really tries to avoid this sort of marketing issue. If it's faster than they say, that's fine, but if they have to then tell you that another product is crappier because they don't both meet a higher claimed performance mark, that's not good for Apple's image. I’m thinking the obvious reason for the performance discrepancy is that they didn’t want to make the new Express 802.11n seem like a crap product by then having to claim lower numbers — Apple really tries to avoid this sort of marketing issue. If it’s faster than they say, that’s fine, but if they have to then tell you that another product is crappier because they don’t both meet a higher claimed performance mark, that’s not good for Apple’s image.

]]>