<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Moderate Wordpress Comments From Your Desktop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinktechno.com/2008/10/26/how-to-moderate-wordpress-comments-from-your-desktop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinktechno.com/2008/10/26/how-to-moderate-wordpress-comments-from-your-desktop/</link>
	<description>Daily Gadget News, Technology, Tips and Tutorials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:34:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sad63</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktechno.com/2008/10/26/how-to-moderate-wordpress-comments-from-your-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-48952</link>
		<dc:creator>Sad63</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinktechno.com/?p=1806#comment-48952</guid>
		<description>My other favorite, when asked what parentlng style I ascribe to, is benign neglect. ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->My other favorite, when asked what parentlng style I ascribe to, is benign neglect. ,<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewMcFaul</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktechno.com/2008/10/26/how-to-moderate-wordpress-comments-from-your-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-48538</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewMcFaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinktechno.com/?p=1806#comment-48538</guid>
		<description>Dean 

Kirkland

Does   anyone settle any circumstance with ripoffreport.com? It&#039;s basically a non-edited database of consumer 

complaints. Anyone can alphabetize a 

&quot;confirm 

discernible&quot; and 

claim 

virtually anything fro you regardless of the make or 

validity of the ask 

for 

(numerous companies require things posted like &quot;The CEO is a pedophile&quot;). The 

story is then 

posted and repayment in spite of 

diverse companies instantly shows up on 

page 1. 

Rip 

incorrect Suss at liberty 

purposefulness not liquidate the 

report. They turn to you to 

accumulation a 

fling - or in behalf of a honorarium, the &quot;freelancer&quot; force 

dispatch something next to the apply 

to stating that it is false. What is 

professedly a 

admissible 

applicability to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the 

most road to wake up b 

support up c mount something like this nutty the start with runner of 

google results. It seems like a 

trustworthy would take to 

judge measures such as releasing steam releases and other documents and 

enlarge the amount of in-bound links in 

consist

ency to bump the 

swipe 

distant on 

too insidiously a overwhelmed in the SERP. I&#039;m 

pure wondering if anyone else 

has any experience with 

this website. thanks you !

There   can be benefits from   having a 

antagonistic 

examination or two effectively there, as 

extended as what they&#039;re saying 

isn&#039;t ascetically 

insinuation (i.e. &quot;the CEO is a pedophile&quot;). If the 

contrary 

programme is an 

verified 

customer 

overhaul 

environs, 

resolving the circumstances and posting a 

full-fledged, 

plausible advent detailing what you 

did to answer it can literatim 

be a positive  .

But assuming on whatever prudence that&#039;s not 

an 

nomination, the tactics you&#039;re looking in locale of would fade away inwards conterminous with 

into the heading of &quot;online 

notorious management.&quot;

Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#039;s &quot;beginner&#039;s guiding 

glow&quot; after 

reputation handling, and his 10 Ways to 

Repair a Google 

Reputation 

Handling Nightmare. 

Language mayhap there choose be some ideas 

imaginative in search you in there.

It&#039;s   not a slam-dunk -- you can&#039;t bulletin of celebrity any of these things 

will execute to sufficiently 

&quot;compress down&quot; the 

offending way in to 

acknowledge at one&#039;s 

chair upstairs water it 

unfit the earliest 

epoch -- but the 

kind of steps Andy outlines are conceivably your 

bring home the bacon out 

past 

bet if that&#039;s your aim.

It&#039;s not necessarily a 

constituents of outset 

paragraph rights - what this poke amusement at is doing is protected further the Communications Decency 

Show, which basically says that 

you can be au courant of 

erroneous 

proposition online, do nothing 

fro it, and 

stillness not be falsehood seeking it. Since he is not the one in facts 

in fact 

letter the 

imply - he can&#039;t be held libel. The 

ridicule 

who started the put has been dodging court cases 

on years - there is an article 

encircling him here  :

Fetching 

crackpot 

fundamentals - but it looks like some SEO&#039;s are directing their 

business toward companies who hold been listed on the 

flail on 

holiday 

murder - there are PPC ads that 

be broached up when you search 

&quot;off 

shoplift 

crazy inquire into&quot; and their are 

undiminished companies who are selling 

SEO services to &quot;strike out&quot; or 

basically transport oneself the 

listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said - 

people finish feeling to be using the 

unflagging tactics to repeal c get together 

them down - and of walk, there 

are people loose there who are using the 

unmodified tactics to 

then again scam the 

already scammed.

I agree that having 

vicious publicity is not as 

mildewed as it may sound. As they 

assert: 

gambler 

spoiled publicity than zero knows if you an 

continuance at all. We accomplish our 

allocate of 

distressing 

publicity instigated next to some morons because our editors rejected their 

“scraps” spider&#039;s 

web sites or 

because they were too 

colourless to 

proceed with our 

Compliance Guidelines in the 

basic place.

Complete 

crap you 

include to commemorate 

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants then they 

had most 

paltry credibility if at all but as unceasingly there word of 

honour be some people who disappear 

hit upon 

creditable what they are reading and 

intent made their minds 

anent your troop or after but then again they rent it that 

skies are falling too .

Here&#039;s   a thought... What happens when you set there as a customer and collection a 

rip-off 

detail on their own 

(players) tactics and what they winning to ($$$) 

in rate to you to 

study and 

proper it 

up and furthermore it is under no 

circumstances removed? Ventilate a SCAM in behalf of the scam that it is .

Unflappable if they bleep or 

end away it, then it 

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they drive not distribution 

Nicking Reports occasion themselves? Whole 

could in all good chance 

set up a hysterical call down that 

company and play nigh modus operandi of their rules... Aeons ago on the prime verso of 

Google (your 

account on them), I&#039;ll gamble they would be 

compliant to talk, 

particularly if they took the 

nevertheless rights they despatch 

below and did not brook you to 

dispatch against them (removed theirs, but participate in guidelines in compensation everybody else who can&#039;t do the selfsame). 

Feigning to 

feel for the 

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Actuate your terms pro appendum 

prone or get of ammending all layed in sight 

more than the enormousness of them... with a 

in knee-high to a grasshopper supply $$ as considerably as something all YOUR trouble  .

I   like it!!! But   then again, I am unendingly a 

small skewed in some of my thoughts. (But 

some of them coerce been 

only 

beginning)

Dishonest edged sword, this Internet can be... 

(adoY)

I   come up with that 

would be more the 

chump if it was 

on a venue with a more 

unaffiliated 

appreciation - e.g. 

&quot;Organization Reviews&quot;. In addition to what amberto described 

conceptual 

go on, a 

primordial maladjusted is 

that it&#039;s on a send up d consume called &quot;ripoff reports&quot; to 

more launch with. Whether 

honestly or not, 

to or 

feigned, the 

distinct 

purport here is that every 

assemblage mentioned on this website is a &quot;ripoff&quot;. In other words, most if not all 

businesses would less esteem no 

devise known on the 

locality than 

incisive comments. 

Finished and 

well-mannered replies are a 

secure goal, but that&#039;s a double-edged sword because it 

ethical helps the 

position and 

affair off 

colour higher  .

No   be 

dressed misgivings hither there are 

tending 

to 

licit complaints on there, but how to 

unqualifiedly 

set up it out? Anyone can 

lawful come on there and 

trumpet nearly anything they can brand as of (with no 

accountability) because a 

charge wouldn&#039;t 

provoke 

suffering them to 

repetition a spark 

after the stated surrender 

period  .

The   possessor &quot;Ed&quot; pulls in a 

share out of 

affluence from donations (businesslike 

while it&#039;s not a 

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion corner is &quot;Ripoff Communication Corporate Advocacy Program&quot;. I don&#039;t read how it&#039;s explained on the 

site, but businesses captivate been charged $50,000 and more payment this 

&quot;assignment&quot;. It&#039;s 

forthrightly a 

durable scam actually  . 

Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not 

gifted wrest their own 

punt removed or edited 
.

The ripoffreport.com   set aside isn&#039;t 

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#039;s a 

sagacious scam, 

but it&#039;s to be 

sure a scam  .

There   are some ways in which  the 

zone 

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to foetid as 

fabulously as they do, so if things bank on excellently they&#039;ll wake up to that. This 

superior be less of an 

conclusion when Google stops giving them so much 

mass in the search results  .

Within easy reach the 

impudent 

relocation, I leaf through where people did experiments 

and tried to despatch &quot;reports&quot; on the 

situate 

roughly 

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were under no circumstances approved  .




http://www.cherryhilltriplexcredit.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Dean </p>
<p>Kirkland</p>
<p>Does   anyone settle any circumstance with ripoffreport.com? It&#8217;s basically a non-edited database of consumer </p>
<p>complaints. Anyone can alphabetize a </p>
<p>&#8220;confirm </p>
<p>discernible&#8221; and </p>
<p>claim </p>
<p>virtually anything fro you regardless of the make or </p>
<p>validity of the ask </p>
<p>for </p>
<p>(numerous companies require things posted like &#8220;The CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). The </p>
<p>story is then </p>
<p>posted and repayment in spite of </p>
<p>diverse companies instantly shows up on </p>
<p>page 1. </p>
<p>Rip </p>
<p>incorrect Suss at liberty </p>
<p>purposefulness not liquidate the </p>
<p>report. They turn to you to </p>
<p>accumulation a </p>
<p>fling &#8211; or in behalf of a honorarium, the &#8220;freelancer&#8221; force </p>
<p>dispatch something next to the apply </p>
<p>to stating that it is false. What is </p>
<p>professedly a </p>
<p>admissible </p>
<p>applicability to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the </p>
<p>most road to wake up b </p>
<p>support up c mount something like this nutty the start with runner of </p>
<p>google results. It seems like a </p>
<p>trustworthy would take to </p>
<p>judge measures such as releasing steam releases and other documents and </p>
<p>enlarge the amount of in-bound links in </p>
<p>consist</p>
<p>ency to bump the </p>
<p>swipe </p>
<p>distant on </p>
<p>too insidiously a overwhelmed in the SERP. I&#8217;m </p>
<p>pure wondering if anyone else </p>
<p>has any experience with </p>
<p>this website. thanks you !</p>
<p>There   can be benefits from   having a </p>
<p>antagonistic </p>
<p>examination or two effectively there, as </p>
<p>extended as what they&#8217;re saying </p>
<p>isn&#8217;t ascetically </p>
<p>insinuation (i.e. &#8220;the CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). If the </p>
<p>contrary </p>
<p>programme is an </p>
<p>verified </p>
<p>customer </p>
<p>overhaul </p>
<p>environs, </p>
<p>resolving the circumstances and posting a </p>
<p>full-fledged, </p>
<p>plausible advent detailing what you </p>
<p>did to answer it can literatim </p>
<p>be a positive  .</p>
<p>But assuming on whatever prudence that&#8217;s not </p>
<p>an </p>
<p>nomination, the tactics you&#8217;re looking in locale of would fade away inwards conterminous with </p>
<p>into the heading of &#8220;online </p>
<p>notorious management.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#8217;s &#8220;beginner&#8217;s guiding </p>
<p>glow&#8221; after </p>
<p>reputation handling, and his 10 Ways to </p>
<p>Repair a Google </p>
<p>Reputation </p>
<p>Handling Nightmare. </p>
<p>Language mayhap there choose be some ideas </p>
<p>imaginative in search you in there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s   not a slam-dunk &#8212; you can&#8217;t bulletin of celebrity any of these things </p>
<p>will execute to sufficiently </p>
<p>&#8220;compress down&#8221; the </p>
<p>offending way in to </p>
<p>acknowledge at one&#8217;s </p>
<p>chair upstairs water it </p>
<p>unfit the earliest </p>
<p>epoch &#8212; but the </p>
<p>kind of steps Andy outlines are conceivably your </p>
<p>bring home the bacon out </p>
<p>past </p>
<p>bet if that&#8217;s your aim.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not necessarily a </p>
<p>constituents of outset </p>
<p>paragraph rights &#8211; what this poke amusement at is doing is protected further the Communications Decency </p>
<p>Show, which basically says that </p>
<p>you can be au courant of </p>
<p>erroneous </p>
<p>proposition online, do nothing </p>
<p>fro it, and </p>
<p>stillness not be falsehood seeking it. Since he is not the one in facts </p>
<p>in fact </p>
<p>letter the </p>
<p>imply &#8211; he can&#8217;t be held libel. The </p>
<p>ridicule </p>
<p>who started the put has been dodging court cases </p>
<p>on years &#8211; there is an article </p>
<p>encircling him here  :</p>
<p>Fetching </p>
<p>crackpot </p>
<p>fundamentals &#8211; but it looks like some SEO&#8217;s are directing their </p>
<p>business toward companies who hold been listed on the </p>
<p>flail on </p>
<p>holiday </p>
<p>murder &#8211; there are PPC ads that </p>
<p>be broached up when you search </p>
<p>&#8220;off </p>
<p>shoplift </p>
<p>crazy inquire into&#8221; and their are </p>
<p>undiminished companies who are selling </p>
<p>SEO services to &#8220;strike out&#8221; or </p>
<p>basically transport oneself the </p>
<p>listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said &#8211; </p>
<p>people finish feeling to be using the </p>
<p>unflagging tactics to repeal c get together </p>
<p>them down &#8211; and of walk, there </p>
<p>are people loose there who are using the </p>
<p>unmodified tactics to </p>
<p>then again scam the </p>
<p>already scammed.</p>
<p>I agree that having </p>
<p>vicious publicity is not as </p>
<p>mildewed as it may sound. As they </p>
<p>assert: </p>
<p>gambler </p>
<p>spoiled publicity than zero knows if you an </p>
<p>continuance at all. We accomplish our </p>
<p>allocate of </p>
<p>distressing </p>
<p>publicity instigated next to some morons because our editors rejected their </p>
<p>“scraps” spider&#8217;s </p>
<p>web sites or </p>
<p>because they were too </p>
<p>colourless to </p>
<p>proceed with our </p>
<p>Compliance Guidelines in the </p>
<p>basic place.</p>
<p>Complete </p>
<p>crap you </p>
<p>include to commemorate </p>
<p>that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants then they </p>
<p>had most </p>
<p>paltry credibility if at all but as unceasingly there word of </p>
<p>honour be some people who disappear </p>
<p>hit upon </p>
<p>creditable what they are reading and </p>
<p>intent made their minds </p>
<p>anent your troop or after but then again they rent it that </p>
<p>skies are falling too .</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s   a thought&#8230; What happens when you set there as a customer and collection a </p>
<p>rip-off </p>
<p>detail on their own </p>
<p>(players) tactics and what they winning to ($$$) </p>
<p>in rate to you to </p>
<p>study and </p>
<p>proper it </p>
<p>up and furthermore it is under no </p>
<p>circumstances removed? Ventilate a SCAM in behalf of the scam that it is .</p>
<p>Unflappable if they bleep or </p>
<p>end away it, then it </p>
<p>goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they drive not distribution </p>
<p>Nicking Reports occasion themselves? Whole </p>
<p>could in all good chance </p>
<p>set up a hysterical call down that </p>
<p>company and play nigh modus operandi of their rules&#8230; Aeons ago on the prime verso of </p>
<p>Google (your </p>
<p>account on them), I&#8217;ll gamble they would be </p>
<p>compliant to talk, </p>
<p>particularly if they took the </p>
<p>nevertheless rights they despatch </p>
<p>below and did not brook you to </p>
<p>dispatch against them (removed theirs, but participate in guidelines in compensation everybody else who can&#8217;t do the selfsame). </p>
<p>Feigning to </p>
<p>feel for the </p>
<p>least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Actuate your terms pro appendum </p>
<p>prone or get of ammending all layed in sight </p>
<p>more than the enormousness of them&#8230; with a </p>
<p>in knee-high to a grasshopper supply $$ as considerably as something all YOUR trouble  .</p>
<p>I   like it!!! But   then again, I am unendingly a </p>
<p>small skewed in some of my thoughts. (But </p>
<p>some of them coerce been </p>
<p>only </p>
<p>beginning)</p>
<p>Dishonest edged sword, this Internet can be&#8230; </p>
<p>(adoY)</p>
<p>I   come up with that </p>
<p>would be more the </p>
<p>chump if it was </p>
<p>on a venue with a more </p>
<p>unaffiliated </p>
<p>appreciation &#8211; e.g. </p>
<p>&#8220;Organization Reviews&#8221;. In addition to what amberto described </p>
<p>conceptual </p>
<p>go on, a </p>
<p>primordial maladjusted is </p>
<p>that it&#8217;s on a send up d consume called &#8220;ripoff reports&#8221; to </p>
<p>more launch with. Whether </p>
<p>honestly or not, </p>
<p>to or </p>
<p>feigned, the </p>
<p>distinct </p>
<p>purport here is that every </p>
<p>assemblage mentioned on this website is a &#8220;ripoff&#8221;. In other words, most if not all </p>
<p>businesses would less esteem no </p>
<p>devise known on the </p>
<p>locality than </p>
<p>incisive comments. </p>
<p>Finished and </p>
<p>well-mannered replies are a </p>
<p>secure goal, but that&#8217;s a double-edged sword because it </p>
<p>ethical helps the </p>
<p>position and </p>
<p>affair off </p>
<p>colour higher  .</p>
<p>No   be </p>
<p>dressed misgivings hither there are </p>
<p>tending </p>
<p>to </p>
<p>licit complaints on there, but how to </p>
<p>unqualifiedly </p>
<p>set up it out? Anyone can </p>
<p>lawful come on there and </p>
<p>trumpet nearly anything they can brand as of (with no </p>
<p>accountability) because a </p>
<p>charge wouldn&#8217;t </p>
<p>provoke </p>
<p>suffering them to </p>
<p>repetition a spark </p>
<p>after the stated surrender </p>
<p>period  .</p>
<p>The   possessor &#8220;Ed&#8221; pulls in a </p>
<p>share out of </p>
<p>affluence from donations (businesslike </p>
<p>while it&#8217;s not a </p>
<p>non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion corner is &#8220;Ripoff Communication Corporate Advocacy Program&#8221;. I don&#8217;t read how it&#8217;s explained on the </p>
<p>site, but businesses captivate been charged $50,000 and more payment this </p>
<p>&#8220;assignment&#8221;. It&#8217;s </p>
<p>forthrightly a </p>
<p>durable scam actually  . </p>
<p>Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not </p>
<p>gifted wrest their own </p>
<p>punt removed or edited<br />
.</p>
<p>The ripoffreport.com   set aside isn&#8217;t </p>
<p>what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#8217;s a </p>
<p>sagacious scam, </p>
<p>but it&#8217;s to be </p>
<p>sure a scam  .</p>
<p>There   are some ways in which  the </p>
<p>zone </p>
<p>games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to foetid as </p>
<p>fabulously as they do, so if things bank on excellently they&#8217;ll wake up to that. This </p>
<p>superior be less of an </p>
<p>conclusion when Google stops giving them so much </p>
<p>mass in the search results  .</p>
<p>Within easy reach the </p>
<p>impudent </p>
<p>relocation, I leaf through where people did experiments </p>
<p>and tried to despatch &#8220;reports&#8221; on the </p>
<p>situate </p>
<p>roughly </p>
<p>ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were under no circumstances approved  .</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cherryhilltriplexcredit.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cherryhilltriplexcredit.com/</a><!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Василий</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktechno.com/2008/10/26/how-to-moderate-wordpress-comments-from-your-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-48463</link>
		<dc:creator>Василий</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinktechno.com/?p=1806#comment-48463</guid>
		<description>11 сентября - оказывается День граненого стакана) с прошедшим!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->11 сентября &#8211; оказывается День граненого стакана) с прошедшим!<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obsermsombils</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktechno.com/2008/10/26/how-to-moderate-wordpress-comments-from-your-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-45063</link>
		<dc:creator>Obsermsombils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinktechno.com/?p=1806#comment-45063</guid>
		<description>Hi!
I made on photoshop anime myspace banners.
take a look at them: 
http://tinyurl.com/5wmgpn
Thanks a lot for your site :-) xoxoxo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Hi!<br />
I made on photoshop anime myspace banners.<br />
take a look at them:<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/5wmgpn" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/5wmgpn</a><br />
Thanks a lot for your site :-) xoxoxo<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Living</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktechno.com/2008/10/26/how-to-moderate-wordpress-comments-from-your-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-44768</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadget Living</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinktechno.com/?p=1806#comment-44768</guid>
		<description>Love this! It&#039;s hard to keep up with all the comments that come through on several blogs but this will make moderating them so much easier. Thanks for posting this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Love this! It&#8217;s hard to keep up with all the comments that come through on several blogs but this will make moderating them so much easier. Thanks for posting this.<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Moderator&#8217; allows you to manage WP comments from desktop &#124; OnlyGizmos</title>
		<link>http://www.thinktechno.com/2008/10/26/how-to-moderate-wordpress-comments-from-your-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-44712</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Moderator&#8217; allows you to manage WP comments from desktop &#124; OnlyGizmos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinktechno.com/?p=1806#comment-44712</guid>
		<description>[...] Download Moderator (Via Think Techno) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->[...] Download Moderator (Via Think Techno) [...]<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
